Lawyers In

death attorney and death lawyers information and location

Sample:

Wrongful Death Claim

An older man in his early sixties walked into my office after making an appointment. He looked very tired and worned out. His eyes were bloodshot from lack of sleep. There were dark circles around his eyes and it was clear he had not eaten well or rested in a while. He then told me how he had lost his son. It was a very sad story. One can only imagine how painful the experience must have been. Following the death of his son, he did not know what to do. He wanted justice, but how can there be justice for the death of his son ? No one can bring him back. He had previously contacted a TV lawyer that dropped the case after reviewing a negative highway patrol report. We made no promises other than doing our best. After a thorough investigation we determined the Highway patrol made an error. Soon after we resolved the case for him, and he was pleased to see that his son’s life had been validated.

Family Law Attorneys Chicago illinois

Durkin & Roberts
53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 615, Chicago, Illinois 60604 U.S.A.
Preeminent Criminal Defense & International Human Rights Practice.

Stuart T. Edelstein, Ltd.
100 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1910, Chicago, Illinois 60602 U.S.A.
Representing Individuals and Small Businesses for Almost 50 Years in Chicago, Cook County, and Lake County, Illinois. Abundance of experience with Liquor Licensing and probate matters.

Robert H. Hirsch Law Office
180 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 3150, Chicago, Illinois 60601 U.S.A.
Robert H. Hirsch is a practicing divorce attorney, duly licensed in the State of Illinois for more than 40 years. He has prosecuted and defended numerous divorce Appellate Court Proceedings.

Social justiceis a euphemism for tyranny

by David Ziemer

Deep down, I’m just a simple, provincial lawyer

So, the powerlust that motivates what is called “the social justice crowd” has always been something I couldn’t fathom. I gave up trying to understand their motivation decades ago.

In rereading John Milton’s “Paradise Lost,” though, I may have finally found the understanding I was seeking. The most powerful passage in the poem is when, upon his expulsion from Heaven, Satan wakes up next to the burning lake in Hell and delivers a monologue to rationalize his situation.

In that monologue, he utters the classic line, “Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.”

That desire to reign in Hell, I believe, must be what drives all those who advocate for positive rights, such as the right to health care, as opposed to negative rights, such as the right to free speech.

Logically, something like health care cannot be considered a right. After all, if one person has a right to do nothing, yet still receive free health care, then so does everyone. But someone has to actually provide the health care, someone has to invent and manufacture pills, and someone else has to create the wealth needed to pay for it all.

Yet all those people have the right to do nothing while someone else provides for their health, too. So, creating a right to health care for all ultimately must lead to no health care for anyone.

Until that point was reached, though, what would happen if health care were to be recognized as a right is that a new class would arise – the class that gets to order Doctor A to provide health services to Citizen A, and Citizen B to pay for it.

In other words, someone gets to reign in Hell; and the social justice crowd wants to be the ones who do.

A right to state-provided legal representation in civil cases would be no different. Some lucky citizens would get free lawyers; some poor citizens would have to pay for them; some lawyers would have to provide the legal services; and someone would get to decide who are the chosen ones, and who has to be the saps.

The social justice crowd wants to reign in Hell, and be the ones to make those choices.

That would be a much cushier job than setting up a law practice and doing the hard work necessary to get and keep clients.

Thus, by returning to Milton’s classic work, I finally discovered that speaking of positive rights is just code language for expressing the desire to reign, rather than to serve.

And that “social justice” is just a euphemism for “tyranny.”

Source: http://www.wislawjournal.com/article.cfm?recID=75805